Saturn SL
What it costs to keep fuelled
$1,758a year, fuel only
The 2002 Saturn SL is EPA-rated at 27.3 MPG combined (23.5 city / 34 highway). Over 15,000 miles a year that is about 549 gallons, $1758 a year in fuel, or $0.117 per mile at $3.20/gal.
Across its full 1991–2002 run it averages 26.6 MPG, improving by 1.8 MPG over 12 model years.
The band is how far one gallon carries it: 27.3 of the 60 MPG this scale runs to. The square tick is the compact cars average, 26.6.
- Fuel, per year
- $1,758 at 15,000 mi
- Per mile
- $0.117
- Per kilometre
- $0.073
- Gallons burned/yr
- 549
1 mile = 1.609344 km · fuel at $3.20/gal, fixed JUL 2026
Test figure — not a road resultSOURCE·US EPA fuel-economy test data·FUEL ASSUMED AT $3.20/GAL FROM JUL 2026·REVIEWED JUL 2026
How this is worked out
- Start from the EPA combined figure for the model year — a laboratory test cycle run to a fixed procedure, not a road result. Where a year sold several engines or drivetrains, the trims are averaged and the trim count is printed beside the row so you can see how much averaging is behind it.
- Fix a pump price. This site keeps one reference price, $3.20 a US gallon, fixed JUL 2026 and printed next to every dollar figure it produces. It is an assumption with a date on it, not a quote — put your own price in.
- Fix an annual distance. Every annual figure on this site uses 15,000 miles a year, roughly the US average. A cost per year with no stated distance is not a number, it is a mood.
- Divide distance by economy for gallons, multiply by price for the year's fuel, divide price by economy for one mile. The per-kilometre line is that last figure divided by 1.609344 — the same money, in the unit most of the world drives in.
- Stop there. No depreciation, no tyres, no insurance, no servicing. This is the fuel line of the ledger and it is labelled as one; depreciation usually dwarfs everything on it.
gallons/yr = miles/yr ÷ MPG fuel $/yr = gallons/yr × $/gal cost $/mi = $/gal ÷ MPG cost $/km = cost $/mi ÷ 1.609344
The full method, the licence note, and what a test figure cannot tell you →
Re-run the ledger at another pump price
Every line above rests on one pump price. Here is the same entry re-costed at six others, because the price is the part that changes while the test sheet stays put.
| Fuel price | Per mile | 10,000 mi/yr | 15,000 mi/yr | 20,000 mi/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $2.50/gal | $0.092 | $916 | $1374 | $1832 |
| $3.00/gal | $0.110 | $1099 | $1648 | $2198 |
| $3.20/gal | $0.117 | $1172 | $1758 | $2344 |
| $3.50/gal | $0.128 | $1282 | $1923 | $2564 |
| $4.00/gal | $0.147 | $1465 | $2198 | $2930 |
| $4.50/gal | $0.165 | $1648 | $2473 | $3297 |
| $5.00/gal | $0.183 | $1832 | $2747 | $3663 |
SOURCE·US EPA fuel-economy test data·FUEL ASSUMED AT $3.20/GAL FROM JUL 2026·REVIEWED JUL 2026
The whole service history, sheet by sheet
12 model years on file. Read down the combined column: a nameplate that got heavier shows it here long before any brochure admits it.
| Year | Combined | City | Highway | EPA fuel cost/yr | CO₂ g/mi | Trims |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 27.3 MPG | 23.5 | 34 | $2288 | 327 | 4 |
| 2001 | 27.3 MPG | 23.5 | 34 | $2288 | 327 | 4 |
| 2000 | 27.3 MPG | 23.3 | 34 | $2288 | 327 | 4 |
| 1999 | 27.3 MPG | 23.3 | 33.8 | $2288 | 327 | 4 |
| 1998 | 26.5 MPG | 22.8 | 33.5 | $2350 | 336 | 4 |
| 1997 | 26.8 MPG | 22.8 | 33.3 | $2325 | 333 | 4 |
| 1996 | 26.8 MPG | 22.8 | 33 | $2338 | 333 | 4 |
| 1995 | 26.5 MPG | 22.5 | 33 | $2350 | 336 | 4 |
| 1994 | 25.8 MPG | 22.5 | 31.5 | $2425 | 346 | 4 |
| 1993 | 25.8 MPG | 22.3 | 32 | $2425 | 346 | 4 |
| 1992 | 25.8 MPG | 22.3 | 31.5 | $2425 | 346 | 4 |
| 1991 | 25.5 MPG | 22 | 31.5 | $2450 | 349 | 4 |
Where a model year offered several engines or drivetrains, the figure is the average across all EPA-tested trims that year — the trim count is shown so you can see how much averaging is involved.
SOURCE·US EPA fuel-economy test data·FUEL ASSUMED AT $3.20/GAL FROM JUL 2026·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Marked against the rest of the compact cars bay
Among the 227 compact cars models tracked here, the Saturn SL ranks 67 on current figures, against a class average of 26.6 MPG — the square tick on the gauge above.
Closest more-efficient alternatives in the same class: BMW 320i (27.5), Pontiac Lemans (27.7), Acura ILX (28), BMW 330i xDrive (28), Ford Fiesta ST FWD (28).
Tailpipe CO₂ is rated at 327 grams per mile, which works out to roughly 4.9 tonnes a year at 15,000 miles.
Questions asked across the counter
What MPG does the Saturn SL get?
The 2002 Saturn SL is rated at 27.3 MPG combined by the EPA — 23.5 city and 34 highway. Across all 12 model years in the database it averages 26.6 MPG, ranging from 24 to 29 depending on year and trim.
How much does a Saturn SL cost in fuel per year?
At 27.3 MPG and 15,000 miles a year, it burns about 549 gallons — roughly $1758 a year with fuel at $3.20 a gallon, or $0.117 per mile. The EPA's own published annual figure for the 2002 model is $2288.
Has the Saturn SL become more efficient over time?
Yes. It has gone from 25.5 MPG in 1991 to 27.3 in 2002 — an improvement of 1.8 MPG, or 7% across 12 model years.
Is the Saturn SL efficient for its class?
It ranks 67 of 227 in the Compact Cars class on current figures, against a class average of 26.6 MPG. That is 0.7 better than typical for the class.
Pull another logbook off the same shelf
Same class, nearest economy first — the ones a buyer is genuinely choosing between.
SOURCE·US EPA fuel-economy test data·FUEL ASSUMED AT $3.20/GAL FROM JUL 2026·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Cost per mile, per kilometre and per year are computed at a reference price of $3.20 a gallon over 15,000 miles, fixed JUL 2026 — set your own pump price. Estimates based on official test figures and average fuel prices. Real-world consumption varies with driving style, load, terrain and maintenance.
