Part of the data ring
RunCost
Two sheets, one bench · Standard Pickup Trucks

F250 Pickup 2WD vs C1500 Pickup 2WD

Ford F250 Pickup 2WD against Chevrolet C1500 Pickup 2WD, two test sheets laid side by side.

Ford F250 Pickup 2WD

14
MPG · $3429/yr
vs

Chevrolet C1500 Pickup 2WD

14.5
MPG · $3310/yr
More efficient

The gap, in fuel

$118a year between them

The Chevrolet C1500 Pickup 2WD is more efficient — 14.5 MPG against 14 for the Ford F250 Pickup 2WD. Over 15,000 miles a year at $3.20 a gallon that is a saving of about $118 a year, or $591 over five years.

SOURCE·US EPA fuel-economy test data·FUEL ASSUMED AT $3.20/GAL FROM JUL 2026·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How this is worked out

  1. Start from the EPA combined figure for the model year — a laboratory test cycle run to a fixed procedure, not a road result. Where a year sold several engines or drivetrains, the trims are averaged and the trim count is printed beside the row so you can see how much averaging is behind it.
  2. Fix a pump price. This site keeps one reference price, $3.20 a US gallon, fixed JUL 2026 and printed next to every dollar figure it produces. It is an assumption with a date on it, not a quote — put your own price in.
  3. Fix an annual distance. Every annual figure on this site uses 15,000 miles a year, roughly the US average. A cost per year with no stated distance is not a number, it is a mood.
  4. Divide distance by economy for gallons, multiply by price for the year's fuel, divide price by economy for one mile. The per-kilometre line is that last figure divided by 1.609344 — the same money, in the unit most of the world drives in.
  5. Stop there. No depreciation, no tyres, no insurance, no servicing. This is the fuel line of the ledger and it is labelled as one; depreciation usually dwarfs everything on it.
gallons/yr = miles/yr ÷ MPG
fuel  $/yr = gallons/yr × $/gal
cost  $/mi = $/gal ÷ MPG
cost  $/km = cost $/mi ÷ 1.609344

The full method, the licence note, and what a test figure cannot tell you →

Both sheets, line for line

Ford F250 Pickup 2WDChevrolet C1500 Pickup 2WD
Combined economy 14 14.5
Best year on record 16 20
Worst year on record 10 9
Average across all years 13.9 15.6
Fuel per year 3429 3310
Gallons per year 1071 1034
CO₂ g/mi 635 614
Model years tracked 15 11
ClassStandard Pickup TrucksStandard Pickup Trucks
Years1984–19991989–1999

Highlighted cells are the better of the two on that measure. Fuel costs at $3.20/gal over 15,000 miles.

SOURCE·US EPA fuel-economy test data·FUEL ASSUMED AT $3.20/GAL FROM JUL 2026·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Questions asked across the counter

Which is more fuel efficient, the Ford F250 Pickup 2WD or the Chevrolet C1500 Pickup 2WD?

The Chevrolet C1500 Pickup 2WD is more efficient — 14.5 MPG against 14 for the Ford F250 Pickup 2WD. Over 15,000 miles a year at $3.20 a gallon that is a saving of about $118 a year, or $591 over five years.

Which is cheaper to run, the Ford F250 Pickup 2WD or the Chevrolet C1500 Pickup 2WD?

On fuel alone, the Chevrolet C1500 Pickup 2WD: $3310 a year against $3429 for the Ford F250 Pickup 2WD, both at $3.20 a gallon over 15,000 miles — an assumption fixed JUL 2026. Fuel is the only line being compared: depreciation, insurance, tyres and servicing are not in it, and they routinely matter more than this gap.

Is the difference big enough to change the decision?

Across five years of that same driving the gap comes to about $591. That is real money, and it is also roughly what one year of depreciation does to a new car — so treat it as one line in the ledger rather than the whole argument.

Both entries carry the full year-by-year history and the pump-price ledger. Estimates based on official test figures and average fuel prices. Real-world consumption varies with driving style, load, terrain and maintenance.

See all 10 sites in this family, with what each one answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.