Toyota Highlander 2WD
What it costs to keep fuelled
$2,233a year, fuel only
The 2016 Toyota Highlander 2WD is EPA-rated at 21.5 MPG combined (19.5 city / 25 highway). Over 15,000 miles a year that is about 698 gallons, $2233 a year in fuel, or $0.149 per mile at $3.20/gal.
Across its full 2001–2016 run it averages 20.7 MPG, improving by 1.5 MPG over 16 model years.
The band is how far one gallon carries it: 21.5 of the 60 MPG this scale runs to. The square tick is the sport utility vehicle - 2wd average, 20.7.
- Fuel, per year
- $2,233 at 15,000 mi
- Per mile
- $0.149
- Per kilometre
- $0.092
- Gallons burned/yr
- 698
1 mile = 1.609344 km · fuel at $3.20/gal, fixed JUL 2026
Test figure — not a road resultSOURCE·US EPA fuel-economy test data·FUEL ASSUMED AT $3.20/GAL FROM JUL 2026·REVIEWED JUL 2026
How this is worked out
- Start from the EPA combined figure for the model year — a laboratory test cycle run to a fixed procedure, not a road result. Where a year sold several engines or drivetrains, the trims are averaged and the trim count is printed beside the row so you can see how much averaging is behind it.
- Fix a pump price. This site keeps one reference price, $3.20 a US gallon, fixed JUL 2026 and printed next to every dollar figure it produces. It is an assumption with a date on it, not a quote — put your own price in.
- Fix an annual distance. Every annual figure on this site uses 15,000 miles a year, roughly the US average. A cost per year with no stated distance is not a number, it is a mood.
- Divide distance by economy for gallons, multiply by price for the year's fuel, divide price by economy for one mile. The per-kilometre line is that last figure divided by 1.609344 — the same money, in the unit most of the world drives in.
- Stop there. No depreciation, no tyres, no insurance, no servicing. This is the fuel line of the ledger and it is labelled as one; depreciation usually dwarfs everything on it.
gallons/yr = miles/yr ÷ MPG fuel $/yr = gallons/yr × $/gal cost $/mi = $/gal ÷ MPG cost $/km = cost $/mi ÷ 1.609344
The full method, the licence note, and what a test figure cannot tell you →
Re-run the ledger at another pump price
Every line above rests on one pump price. Here is the same entry re-costed at six others, because the price is the part that changes while the test sheet stays put.
| Fuel price | Per mile | 10,000 mi/yr | 15,000 mi/yr | 20,000 mi/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $2.50/gal | $0.116 | $1163 | $1744 | $2326 |
| $3.00/gal | $0.140 | $1395 | $2093 | $2791 |
| $3.20/gal | $0.149 | $1488 | $2233 | $2977 |
| $3.50/gal | $0.163 | $1628 | $2442 | $3256 |
| $4.00/gal | $0.186 | $1860 | $2791 | $3721 |
| $4.50/gal | $0.209 | $2093 | $3140 | $4186 |
| $5.00/gal | $0.233 | $2326 | $3488 | $4651 |
SOURCE·US EPA fuel-economy test data·FUEL ASSUMED AT $3.20/GAL FROM JUL 2026·REVIEWED JUL 2026
The whole service history, sheet by sheet
16 model years on file. Read down the combined column: a nameplate that got heavier shows it here long before any brochure admits it.
| Year | Combined | City | Highway | EPA fuel cost/yr | CO₂ g/mi | Trims |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 21.5 MPG | 19.5 | 25 | $2900 | 412 | 2 |
| 2015 | 21.5 MPG | 19.5 | 25 | $2900 | 412 | 2 |
| 2014 | 21.5 MPG | 19.5 | 25 | $2900 | 409 | 2 |
| 2013 | 21 MPG | 19 | 24.5 | $2975 | 419 | 2 |
| 2012 | 21 MPG | 19 | 24.5 | $2975 | 424 | 2 |
| 2011 | 21 MPG | 19 | 24.5 | $2975 | 424 | 2 |
| 2010 | 21 MPG | 19 | 25.5 | $2975 | 424 | 2 |
| 2009 | 21 MPG | 19 | 25.5 | $2975 | 424 | 2 |
| 2008 | 20 MPG | 18 | 24 | $3100 | 444 | 1 |
| 2007 | 20.5 MPG | 18 | 24 | $3075 | 436 | 2 |
| 2006 | 20.5 MPG | 18 | 24 | $3075 | 436 | 2 |
| 2005 | 20.5 MPG | 18 | 24 | $3075 | 436 | 2 |
| 2004 | 20.5 MPG | 18 | 24 | $3075 | 436 | 2 |
| 2003 | 20 MPG | 18 | 23 | $3150 | 449 | 2 |
| 2002 | 20 MPG | 18 | 23 | $3150 | 449 | 2 |
| 2001 | 20 MPG | 18 | 23 | $3150 | 449 | 2 |
Where a model year offered several engines or drivetrains, the figure is the average across all EPA-tested trims that year — the trim count is shown so you can see how much averaging is involved.
SOURCE·US EPA fuel-economy test data·FUEL ASSUMED AT $3.20/GAL FROM JUL 2026·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Marked against the rest of the sport utility vehicle - 2wd bay
Among the 70 sport utility vehicle - 2wd models tracked here, the Toyota Highlander 2WD ranks 21 on current figures, against a class average of 20.7 MPG — the square tick on the gauge above.
Closest more-efficient alternatives in the same class: Chevrolet Tracker 2WD Convertible (22), Honda Element 2WD (22), Toyota 4Runner 2WD (22), Toyota Venza (22), Honda Pilot 2WD (22.5).
Tailpipe CO₂ is rated at 412 grams per mile, which works out to roughly 6.2 tonnes a year at 15,000 miles.
Questions asked across the counter
What MPG does the Toyota Highlander 2WD get?
The 2016 Toyota Highlander 2WD is rated at 21.5 MPG combined by the EPA — 19.5 city and 25 highway. Across all 16 model years in the database it averages 20.7 MPG, ranging from 18 to 22 depending on year and trim.
How much does a Toyota Highlander 2WD cost in fuel per year?
At 21.5 MPG and 15,000 miles a year, it burns about 698 gallons — roughly $2233 a year with fuel at $3.20 a gallon, or $0.149 per mile. The EPA's own published annual figure for the 2016 model is $2900.
Has the Toyota Highlander 2WD become more efficient over time?
Yes. It has gone from 20 MPG in 2001 to 21.5 in 2016 — an improvement of 1.5 MPG, or 8% across 16 model years.
Is the Toyota Highlander 2WD efficient for its class?
It ranks 21 of 70 in the Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD class on current figures, against a class average of 20.7 MPG. That is 0.8 better than typical for the class.
Pull another logbook off the same shelf
Same class, nearest economy first — the ones a buyer is genuinely choosing between.
SOURCE·US EPA fuel-economy test data·FUEL ASSUMED AT $3.20/GAL FROM JUL 2026·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Cost per mile, per kilometre and per year are computed at a reference price of $3.20 a gallon over 15,000 miles, fixed JUL 2026 — set your own pump price. Estimates based on official test figures and average fuel prices. Real-world consumption varies with driving style, load, terrain and maintenance.
